I was in two minds about writing on events of the last 24 hours, the comments made by Pini Zahavi have already been blown out of all proportion by the hacks in the british media and I was hesitant to give the story any more mileage by dwelling upon it.
However, < sarcasm > showing all the intelligence and common sense that the media is known for< /sarcasm > the cheap shots by Zahavi have morphed into many ignorant and unfounded shots on David Beckham. Zahavi's comments coming on the eve of the Israel England Euro 2008 qualifying match were all to transparent in purpose and were delivered with all the subtlety of a brick through the window of the England team's hotel.
I am not practised in the art of psychological warfare but everyone and their granny, can see that if one of your opponents country men approaches the media on the eve of an important match to say that at the world cup you gave 30% effort and to make a few other remarks on a par with "neener, neener, neener" that it just might be a weak attempt to throw you off your game. In my opinion, Sven Goran Eriksson didn't tell Zahavi their was jealousy in the camp, I think he told him that the trouble for any England team was that they had to not only beat the other side but also Fleet St. I think Zahavi might have been privy to or observed himself, the effect of the pressure from the vicious british press pack and the freezing up at crucial moments that it can bring on. I think his actions were quite calculated and that judging by the press response, sadly right on target. When Rio Ferdinand, one of Zahavi's clients returned from the world cup, he would not leave the house for the first week, he was too ashamed. It would be naieve to under-estimate the very real effect the brutal media coverage has on national team players. If you can make a team fear losing enough, that fear will often times convert into the chronicle of a failure foretold.
The fact that Zahavi's low blows could be met with such acceptance by the british press comes as no surprise. It was a story that would be good for circulation and money is what matters, most british newspapers are owned by Australians after all. The aspect of the coverage I found most disturbing, was that stories began to appear that blamed David Beckham for the other players
supposed jealousy. One man, an agent in a sport where agents are infamous for their lack of scruples, makes an accusation, unproven and with an obvious agenda and yet the british press are so eager to criticize David Beckham that they do not look at the motives or credibility of Pini Zahavi, no, they instead turn on a man who was a faithful and loyal servant to England and who never wore the shirt with anything less than 100% passion, pride and committment.
Were the players jealous of David Beckham? Were they jealous that he was the british media's favourite whipping boy? Did they wish the newspapers would invent stories about plots to have their wife and kids kidnapped? Were they jealous that they didn't get the special security treatment that comes packaged with the opportunity to genuinely be worried every day that someone will hurt one of your children? I don't know. I think it is vacuous to assume that they would all be jealous of David Beckham. Some, might envy the money, although they are all rich men and one or two might envy the fame, although many of the players have seen enough of the spotlight to not want it to shine as brightly on them as it does on David Beckham. Fame is a double edged sword and members of the England national team are familiar enough with its pros and cons to know that. Still it is in human nature to be jealous, jealousy can sometimes be present between friends, so let's for a moment allow that there might have been some measure of jealousy from some members of the squad. Even if this were the case, it is unlikely that any member of the squad would let this over-ride their own self-interest and so I think it is absurd to suggest that jealousy would cause players to pass on a chance to win a World Cup.
The only thing more ludicrous than this, is the suggestion that David Beckham should be blamed for the reactions of others to his success. David Beckham is a lad from Leytonstone who through hard work and despite certain obstacles, the media looming large amongst them, has achieved his dreams. He has had a long career at the top, he has not self-destructed, he has kept a cool head, navigated all the pit falls of fame with a steady hand, stayed true to who he is and focussed primarily on his sport and his family. He is to be celebrated but the british media for whatever reason prefers to criticise, proving only that they are most certainly jealous of David Beckham far more so than any of his team-mates have ever been.